Vanuatu's AG condemns Trump’s Paris climate treaty exit as ‘troubling precedent’

By Harry Pearl, Benar News

Vanuatu's top lawyer has called out the United States' "bad behavior" after newly inaugurated President Donald Trump withdrew the world's biggest historic emitter of greenhouse gasses from the Paris Agreement for a second time.

The Pacific nation's Attorney General Arnold Loughman, who led Vanuatu's landmark International Court of Justice climate case, said the withdrawal represented an "undeniable setback" for international action on global warming.

"The Paris Agreement remains key to the world's efforts to combat climate change and respond to its effects, and the participation of major economies like the U.S. is crucial," he told BenarNews in a statement.

The withdrawal could also set a "troubling precedent" regarding the accountability of rich nations that are disproportionately responsible for global warming, said Loughman.

"At the same time, the U.S.' bad behavior could inspire resolve on behalf of developed countries to act more responsibly to try and safeguard the international rule of law," he said.

"Ultimately, the whole world stands to lose if the international legal framework is allowed to erode."

Trump's announcement on Monday came less than two weeks after scientists confirmed that 2024 was the hottest year on record and the first in which average temperatures exceeded 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Under the Paris Agreement adopted in 2015, leaders agreed to "pursue efforts" to limit warming under the 1.5°C threshold or, failing that, keep rises "well below" 2°C by the end of the century.

Fiji's Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said on Wednesday in a brief comment that Trump's action would "force us to rethink our position" but the U.S. president must do "what is in the best interest of the United States of America."

Other Pacific leaders and the Pacific Islands Forum regional intergovernmental body have not responded to BenarNews requests for comment.

PIF - comprising 18 Pacific states and territories - in their 2018 Boe Declaration said "climate change remains the single greatest threat to the livelihoods, security and wellbeing of the peoples of the Pacific and [reaffirm] our commitment to progress the implementation of the Paris Agreement."

Trump's executive order sparked dismay and criticism in the Pacific, where the impacts of a warming planet are already being felt in the form of more intense storms and rising seas.

Jacynta Fa'amau, regional Pacific campaigner with environmental group 350 Pacific, said the withdrawal would be a diplomatic setback for the U.S.

"The climate crisis has for a long time now been our greatest security threat, especially to the Pacific," she told BenarNews. "This withdrawal from the agreement is a clear signal about how much the U.S. values the survival of Pacific nations and all communities on the front lines."

New Zealand's former Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, said if the U.S. withdrew from its traditional leadership roles in multilateral organizations China would fill the gap.

"Some people may not like how China plays its role," wrote the former Labour MP on Facebook. "But when the great USA withdraws from these global organizations … it just means China can now go about providing global leadership."

Analysts and former White House advisors told BenarNews last year that climate change could be a potential "flashpoint" between Pacific nations and a second Trump administration at a time of heightened geopolitical competition with China.

Trump's announcement was not unexpected. During his first term he withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, only for former President Joe Biden to promptly rejoin in 2021.

The latest withdrawal puts the U.S., the world's largest historic emitter of greenhouse gases, alongside only Iran, Libya and Yemen outside the climate pact.

In his executive order, Trump said the U.S. would immediately begin withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and from any other commitments made under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The U.S. would also end its international climate finance program to developing countries - a blow to small Pacific island states that already struggle to obtain funding for resilience and mitigation.

A fact sheet published by the Biden administration on Nov. 17, which has now been removed from the White House website, said that U.S. international climate finance reached more than US$11 billion in 2024.

Loughman said the cessation of climate finance payments was particularly concerning for the Pacific region.

"These funds are essential for building resilience and supporting adaptation strategies," he said. "Losing this support could severely hinder ongoing and future projects aimed at protecting our vulnerable ecosystems and communities."

George Carter, deputy head of the Department of Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University and member of the COP29 Scientific Council, said at the center of the Biden administration's re-engagement with the South Pacific was a regional program on climate adaptation.

"While the majority of climate finance that flows through the Pacific comes from Australia, Japan, European Union, New Zealand - then the United States - the climate networks and knowledge production from the U.S. to the Pacific are substantial," he told BenarNews.

Pacific island states, like all other signatories to the Paris Agreement, will this year be submitting Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs, outlining their climate action plans for the next five years.

"All climate actions, policies and activities are conditional on international climate finance," Carter said.

Pacific island nations are being disproportionately affected by climate change despite contributing just 0.02% of global emissions, according to a U.N. report released last year.

Low-lying islands are particularly vulnerable to rising sea levels and extreme weather events like cyclones, floods and marine heatwaves, which are projected to occur more frequently this century as a result of higher average global temperatures.

On Jan. 10, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirmed that last year for the first time the global mean temperature tipped over 1.5°C above the 1850-1900 average.

WMO experts emphasized that a single year of more than 1.5°C does not mean that the world has failed to meet long-term temperature goals, which are measured over decades, but added that "leaders must act - now" to avert negative impacts.

This article was first published on BenarNews.

Copyright ©2015-2024, BenarNews. Used with the permission of BenarNews.