18 Jul 2024

Insulation cost 'relatively small' for standard home

5:56 am on 18 July 2024

Renters advocates and a builders association say the potential retraction of new insulation standards is a backwards step for the country.

The government has announced it wants to roll back insulation standards that came into force last year saying it adds between $40,000 to $50,000 to the cost of a new home.

Upgrades to insulation and glazing requirements in May 2023, known as H1 standards were the first significant improvements to insulation standards in New Zealand in more than a decade.

Building and Construction minister Chris Penk told Checkpoint new houses could include costs of $40,000 to $50,000 extra depending on the insulation standard they were held to, and after listening to what people wanted, he believed there should be more choice because of the need for affordable houses.

Certified Builders chief executive Malcolm Fleming said the organisation was surprised to hear the government was considering a roll-back of the standards and it did not support such a move, given the changes had made New Zealand's homes more liveable and sustainable.

Building costs in New Zealand were too high, which stifled demand, so the industry understood the drive to reduce them, he said.

But New Zealand's insulation regulations remained below international standards and Fleming said the industry had been supportive of changes to improve them.

Fleming said talking to some of the organisation's 2350 members, it appeared the H1 standard added between $10,000 to $20,000 in costs for a standard home. Costs of $40,000 to $50,000 were more likely on a home that was worth $2 to $3 million, he said.

"I'd be very interested to know who the minister has been talking to, because he hasn't been talking to the industry, he may have spoken to players within the industry but in terms of trade associations that represent the broader industry, they are not the people who've been providing him the figures that have been quoted.

"Given the savings in heating costs of about 40 percent going forward, it is a relatively small up front investment to be made for significant long term gain."

Certified Builders met with Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk last month to discuss how changes to the standards could reduce building costs without reversing the most effective components.

Chris Penk

Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has confirmed he is looking at rolling back a new standard designed to keep homes warm and dry that was introduced last year. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

Fleming said that could include changes to wall and ceiling insulation requirements, window flashings and materials and slab perimeter insulation.

Overheating issues could occur because of insulation, if houses were not designed to have adequate cross ventilation or windows were north facing and had a lack of shading, issues that were fixable through design work, he said.

There had also been significant investment by the government and the industry to ensure builders were prepared for the new standards when they were introduced last May, Fleming said.

Joinery manufacturers had also invested heavily in new plant and machinery to produce thermally efficient windows and thermally broken window frames that were critical to meet the H1 specification.

"They did that because the demand was guaranteed as it was regulated... and if there was a u-turn on H1, demand would evaporate which sends a sorry signal to the business community who've ramped up on the basis of having to do so."

Renters United spokesperson Zanian Steele said the proposal appeared to be a politically motivated "knee-jerk reaction" that detracted from many of the housing related policies of the previous government.

The announcement came on the back of the return of 90-day no clause evictions and felt like a sustained attack on renters, to rival what had been described as the last government's war on landlords - a rhetoric Steele said was "quite unproductive".

It was concerning that there appeared to be a trade-off between healthy homes for tenants and affordability, Steele said.

"We know that mouldy and damp homes are a major source of healthcare problems and we know that tenants tend to suffer more from housing related health issues than either owners or landlords."

Steele said reducing insulation standards might save costs when it came to building, but it created a burden for the healthcare system and resulted in reduced productivity.

"In the long run we are going to see many, many New Zealanders renting intergenerationally, we have something like 1.7 million renters across the country and protecting them is essential because many of those people will stay in rental properties for the rest of their lives... so it becomes more of a health issue when you consider it through that lens."

Steele said the standards had only been in place for a year, which was not long enough to draw any major conclusions.

Public feedback during the initial consultation for the standards showed overwhelming public support for better insulation, while tenants had been making noise about unhealthy homes for some time.

Steele said it was a non-partisan issue, as no government wanted renters to suffer ill health, or homeowners to be stuck with properties unsuitable for habitation.

Get the RNZ app

for ad-free news and current affairs