By SPREP
Since the 1950s there have been 9.2 billion tonnes of plastic produced of which 7 billion tonnes has become waste now filling up landfills and polluting our ocean. Photo: Facebook / Tony Kokshoorn
The fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4) to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment is taking place in Ottawa, Canada this week.
The Pacific Small Islands Developing States (PSIDS) have prepared for the forum from 23-29 April through a series of meetings, both as PSIDS as well as the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS).
The Pacific Islands are represented by the Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu through the support of the Australian government and the United Nations, regional CROP organisations and other stakeholders.
Plastic pollution is one of the triple planetary crises declared with climate change and biodiversity loss.
Since the 1950s there has been 9.2 billion tonnes of plastic produced of which 7 billion tonnes has become waste now filling up landfills and polluting our ocean.
Unless we act now there will be more plastic than fish in our ocean by the year 2050.
Ahead of the Pacific Islands is the fourth of five negotiations sessions directed to complete a draft instrument by the end of 2024.
The Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programm (SPREP) spent time with Palau's chief negotiator Gwen Sisior to learn more about the current state of negotiations for the INC-4.
Gwen Sisior Photo: SPREP
SPREP: What do you feel are the key issues for the Pacific Small Islands Developing States as we go into the INC-4?
Sisior: I think for the negotiations for PSIDS, we now have to look at the more detailed discussions that are going to happen during INC-4. These detailed discussions could include looking into what this would look like in terms of implementation and whether or not this treaty needs to be detailed enough to discuss all of that.
We also need to understand that we're speaking to a treaty text, and the difference between what a treaty text should look like versus what a Conference of the Parties (COP) decision should be because some of these detailed discussions and resulting text proposals are to me at the level of a COP decision and we don't want to restrict ourselves unnecessarily in the treaty text.
SPREP: What do you feel are our challenges ahead in these negotiations?
Sisior: It's going to be really hard for PSIDS. We really need to be prepared and know this well enough to be able to react on the floor because I think things are going to move quite quickly at INC-4 to develop this treaty. For PSIDS at minimum we need to negotiate to keep our elements in there, especially when it comes to streamlining the text to still maintain and ensure that the elements we want are there.
We should not focus too much on deleting anything that opposes our position and leave that to the actual text-based negotiations because that opens a door to others deleting our position from the beginning, so we need to refrain from doing that. We also need to look at both content and strategy because we are not quite at text-based negotiations yet, so we need to keep that in mind.
There's general agreement that what we have in the revised merged texts is not fit for text-based negotiations. We still have to streamline a lot of these options into a textual format that we can then negotiate. Right now, we're still speaking to elements or the essence of what we would like to see in the treaty.
SPREP: What advice would you have for the moving forward?
Sisior: I know that the Pacific has always been flexible, we always try to be flexible - I think we need to know when to be flexible and when not to be, but we also need to be more strategic in how we use our flexibility as well. We've always been about content and substance which is very important, but considering the way the INCs have been negotiated, strategy is now becoming just as critical as the substance. We need to be more strategic in our way forward.
-This article was first published by SPREP.
